Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Explore (NY) ; 19(1): 65-70, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35577745

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis is one of the most frequent and challenging side effects of chemotherapy. At present, none of the guidelines recommend the use of various mouthwashes available for the treatment of oral mucositis. METHODS: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of curcumin, mucosamin, and chlorhexidine in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. In this randomized and double-blind study, 71 patients over 18 years, who received chemotherapy and suffered from chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis, were randomized into curcumin, mucosamin, and chlorhexidine groups. The World Health Organization (WHO) Oral Toxicity Scale, the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) were used to evaluate oral mucositis. The main endpoint included the onset of complete recovery after starting the treatment. FINDINGS: Based on the WHO, OMAS for erythema, and NRS criteria, complete recovery was achieved from the third day in the curcumin group, which was significantly earlier compared to the other two groups (P < 0.05). The OMAS score for ulceration represented an improvement from day 5 in the curcumin group, which was significantly faster compared to the other two groups (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that all three approaches were effective in improving oral mucositis; however, curcumin could result in faster recovery in comparison with mucosamin and chlorhexidine. The use of curcumin in the treatment of oral mucositis appears to be a viable intervention for reducing potential compromise to treatment and improving the quality of life.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Curcumina , Estomatite , Humanos , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Curcumina/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Estomatite/induzido quimicamente , Estomatite/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos
2.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 59(1): 107-111, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30285276

RESUMO

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially serious adverse drug reaction that can result in lethal vascular thrombosis. Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor that might be useful in the management of HIT. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in patients with HIT. We included 43 patients in the study who received dabigatran for the management of suspected HIT, based on 4Ts (thrombocytopenia, timing of platelet count drop, thrombosis or other sequelae, and other causes of thrombocytopenia) scores. Three patients were excluded because they had received dabigatran with a creatinine clearance <15 mL/min. Patients' records were analyzed longitudinally, with 12 months follow-up from the time of initiation of dabigatran, for occurrence of thrombosis, dabigatran-related complications, and outcome. Patients with chronic kidney disease, hepatic impairment, mechanical heart valves, active bleeding, and extremes of weights (<50 and >120 kg) were excluded from the study. Arterial thrombosis was not observed in any of our patients. The platelet counts normalized in all patients except for 2, which was attributed to the underlying comorbidities. We did not observe any hemorrhagic events or significant thrombosis during the follow-up period. Eight patients died from nonthrombotic causes, which were unrelated to adverse effects of dabigatran. Based on our findings, dabigatran could be considered a safe and effective agent in the management of HIT, particularly in the developing countries, where there could be issues with the cost and availability of other agents recommended for this condition. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Dabigatrana/uso terapêutico , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Trombocitopenia/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dabigatrana/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente
3.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 81(6): 481-496, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27384687

RESUMO

Abnormally invasive placenta is characterized by direct attachment of chorionic villi to the uterine wall. This adherent placenta traditionally has been managed by peripartum hysterectomy. Nowadays, there is a lot of interest toward gradual shift from traditional management of invasive placentation to conservative ones leaving the placenta in situ to avoid the surgical morbidity of hysterectomy and loss of future fertility. Administration of methotrexate (MTX), as an adjunctive antimetabolite drug, resulted in conflicting data during conservative management of abnormal placentation. This review assessed all published data on efficacy and safety of MTX therapy as conservative management of invasive placentation. Fifty-three articles including one prospective cohort study, 2 retrospective cohort studies, 10 case series and 40 case reports were identified. Conservative management has beneficial effects on the avoidance of major surgery with the consequent morbidity and the preservation of future fertility. Infection and vaginal bleeding were main complications of MTX therapy. Although MTX therapy may result in accelerated involution or expulsion of placenta and has some beneficial effects on hemorrhagic events, but there is not enough evidence on its efficacy and safety to recommend its routine uses in all cases of invasive placenta.


Assuntos
Abortivos não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Placenta Acreta/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA